On 7/31/25 16:06, Wayne S wrote:
> Michael, Chuck was knowyo a lot of us on the Classic Computer Discord.
> Everyone was wondering what was going to happen with his collection.
> Glad that you’re willing to oversee the disposition of it all.
>
> Join the discord snd put your post in maybe general channel.
> You’ll get a lot of suggestions and probably buyers.
>
> Here the invite.
> 6e39fdc07ab9ac7cfcf7636761aff7f7.jpg
> Join the ClassicCMP Discord Server! <https://discord.gg/tKedmSze>
> discord.gg <https://discord.gg/tKedmSze>
>
> <https://discord.gg/tKedmSze>
>
Thanks, Wayne. I'll do that.
Chuck was also highly active at the Vintage Computer Federation and there
are lots of people on this forum who should be able to help or advise.
Best wishes to you and his family. From the small amount of contact I had
through the forum, he was a special person.
https://forum.vcfed.org/index.php?threads/sad-news-chuck-g.1253843/page-4#po
st-1459242
How available, as NoS rather than pulls, are K559IP1 and its chums 2 & 3 ?
Martin
-----Original Message-----
From: Holm Tiffe [mailto:holm@freibergnet.de]
Sent: 01 August 2025 10:45
To: Martin Bishop <mjd.bishop(a)emeritus-solutions.com>
Subject: Re: [cctalk] Q about DS3881, N8881 DEC8881..
Martin Bishop wrote:
> The 8881 data sheet you reference is identical to the one I found last night, quicker to search than rummage.
>
ok.
> The closest it comes to an output drive specification is in the test conditions for the "0" output voltage. The 17 ma current with 5v supply and 0v4 Vol limit suggests a 270R test load. This is interestingly different from the Qbus use case of 178/383 termination; the Thevinin equivalent being 120R at 3v4 - equivalent to ~25 mA to pull down to 0v4. And, ~22 mA to pull down to 0v8 - the Lo voltage you require, 0v4 being what you would like.
Yes, I've read that.
>
> I am extremely sceptical that bus currents of 70/80 mA are likely, to get 70 mA you need a Thevinin R of ~40R ie three terminators in parallel (61 / 131); many years ago, I could not get two backplane systems to do reliable DMA - never mind three ... However, its in the spec so everyone wants one ... Similarly, getting down to 0v4 with a realistic NPN is a joke, under 0v8 yes but with a Q-bus as load my expectation is only a bit below 0v6.
..german saying "you are heavy on the wood way! (Du bist schwer auf dem Holzweg..yes, I know english for runnaways (englisch für Fortgeschrittene = nonsense))
Thy don't specify bus currents with 70mA, they specify the maximal Output low current that the device could handle ..which has almost nothing todo with the current in the use case Unibus or Qbus.
>
> If you can obtain K559IP1 I suggest you test them on the bench, they could well be usable. But, yes, the well of old parts is drying out. And, IMHO, some of the requirements in the specs are more what DEC would have liked rather than what they could source.
I already have some on stock and.. I own an russian 11/03 equivalent Elektronika E60 with M2 CPU .. worked 5 years before now, stored sine then. As far as I remember the K559IP1 is used there on some boards, and The Bus is a QBUS ..but with metric dimensions even on the connectors.
If you are interested here are som pics from the boards:
https://www.tiffe.de/Robotron/PDP-VAX/E60/
The Interface Board I4vers3 (И4ред3 in the upper left) E60-06.jpg for the russian RX02 has an K559IP1 (К559ИП1) on the bus side, but nmostly used in this machine are K559IP2 and 3 ..8640 and 8641.
So there is no need to test those chips, I know they are working.
E60-01.jpg and E60-02.jpg are the CPU Board M2.
Regards,
Holm
BTW: why off-list?
[DrB] Your 01 0906Z Aug 25 (below) was off list ...
>
> Best Regards
>
> Martin
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Holm Tiffe [mailto:holm@freibergnet.de]
> Sent: 01 August 2025 09:06
> To: Martin Bishop <mjd.bishop(a)emeritus-solutions.com>
> Subject: Re: [cctalk] Q about DS3881, N8881 DEC8881..
>
> Martin Bishop wrote:
>
> > https://forum.vcfed.org/index.php?threads/dec-ttl-part-number-equiva
> > le nts.79306/ is a collection of rumours about what DEC 8881's
> >
> > DS3862 was a National Semi trapezoidal (ie slew rate limited driver), whether that makes a DS3881 a National part is a good question (never found it).
> >
> > DEC documentation on LSI-11 BusDrivers mentions the 8881 as having DEC order code 957, and describes it as a bus driver. The documentation goes on to say that a 8641 is a 8640 (Bus Rx) integrated with a 8881 (Bus driver); followed by pin out (14p classic TTL NAND pin out) and parametrics. I shall try to find a link to the pdf; I have pp55-58 on A4.
> >
> > The DS3881 might be an urban myth, perpetuated typo / error ?
>
> That's my tough too..
> Regarding the russian Datasheet the K559IP1 can source 70mA (an other databook shows 80mA here) that's over the spec of an 8881 as far as I know, the "1972_Signetics_SSI_8400_8800_TTL_DTL.pdf page 2-44" has no value for the max output sink current..
>
> It seems that this part is modified from the russians but listet as
> DEC Standard and used for the same purpose as the 8881, but it has a
> modified Pinout too (2 extra free pins, DIP16 instead of DIP14)
>
> If found a interesting discussion about the western parts here:
>
> https://forum.vcfed.org/index.php?threads/dec-ttl-part-number-equivale
> nts.79306/
>
> I'm a former East-german from "behind the iron curtain"..that's why I'm at least kew of the existence of that equivalent parts. I still know of a source of 8640, 8641 equivalents and I've bought the last 7 8T24 equivalents there. This source is now drying out too...
>
> Regards,
> Holm
>
> >
> > Martin
> >
> > PS off looking for URLs
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Holm Tiffe via cctalk [mailto:cctalk@classiccmp.org]
> > Sent: 31 July 2025 20:01
> > To: cctalk(a)classiccmp.org
> > Cc: Holm Tiffe <holm(a)freibergnet.de>
> > Subject: [cctalk] Q about DS3881, N8881 DEC8881..
> >
> > The russians build PDP11's and VAXes. They made chips similar to the special DEC chips. For example there is an K559IP2 which is an DS8640, and there is an K559IP1 and they list an DS3881 as equivalent, 4 NAND gates "standard DEC" Bus driver ..hmm.
> >
> > 1,2-3, 4,5-6 10,11-9 and 13,14-12. ..input,input-output. 16 VCC, 8
> > GND,
> > 7,15 free. It is an 16 pin 300mil DIP.
> >
> > Now I have problems to find a Datasheet for an DS3881 which is NOT an CCFL Inverter from Maxim/Dallas/Analog but I' pretty shure I've seen such beasts already in the past.
> > An DEC8881 is sitting next to an DS8640 on a DLV11 I have in my hands..but this is an DIP14 Chip (similar to an 7401 or an 7439).
> >
> > What the heck could a DS3881 be?
> >
> > (DEC Bus drivers are getting rare those days, that's the cause that I've bought those russian chips in the past for cheap..
> >
> > Regards,
> > Holm
> >
> > --
> > Technik Service u. Handel Tiffe, www.tsht.de, Holm Tiffe,
> > Goethestrasse 15, 09569 Oederan, USt-Id: DE253710583
> > info(a)tsht.de Tel +49 37292 709778 Mobil: 0172 8790 741
>
> --
> Technik Service u. Handel Tiffe, www.tsht.de, Holm Tiffe,
> Goethestrasse 15, 09569 Oederan, USt-Id: DE253710583
> info(a)tsht.de Tel +49 37292 709778 Mobil: 0172 8790 741
--
Technik Service u. Handel Tiffe, www.tsht.de, Holm Tiffe,
Goethestrasse 15, 09569 Oederan, USt-Id: DE253710583
info(a)tsht.de Tel +49 37292 709778 Mobil: 0172 8790 741
Peter,
I also had the same problem when using RSX11M instead of M+.
Below is a quick Macro-11 program that sends two VT100 escape sequences.
The first clears the screen and the second sends the cursor home.
It can be easily modified for other terminal types if needed.
For command line editing that works with RSX11M, take a look at the MCE command line editor.
It is a great DECUS program found on RSX SIG Tape Spring 1989 in [265,1]
Best,
Mark
>TYP CLR.MAC
.TITLE Reset VT Terminal
.MCALL QIOW$S,EXIT$S
.EVEN
MSG:
.ASCII <33>/[2J/<33>/[H/
LEN = . - MSG
.EVEN
START: QIOW$S #IO.WVB,#5,#1,,,,<#MSG,#LEN,>
EXIT$S
.END START
>MAC CLR=CLR
>TKB
TKB>CLR=CLR
TKB>/
TKB>TASK=…CLR
TKB>//
>PIP LB:[1,54]/NV/CO=CLR.TSK
>INS $CLR
The russians build PDP11's and VAXes. They made chips similar to the
special DEC chips. For example there is an K559IP2 which is an DS8640,
and there is an K559IP1 and they list an DS3881 as equivalent, 4 NAND
gates "standard DEC" Bus driver ..hmm.
1,2-3, 4,5-6 10,11-9 and 13,14-12. ..input,input-output. 16 VCC, 8 GND,
7,15 free. It is an 16 pin 300mil DIP.
Now I have problems to find a Datasheet for an DS3881 which is NOT an
CCFL Inverter from Maxim/Dallas/Analog but I' pretty shure I've seen such
beasts already in the past.
An DEC8881 is sitting next to an DS8640 on a DLV11 I have in my hands..but
this is an DIP14 Chip (similar to an 7401 or an 7439).
What the heck could a DS3881 be?
(DEC Bus drivers are getting rare those days, that's the cause that I've
bought those russian chips in the past for cheap..
Regards,
Holm
--
Technik Service u. Handel Tiffe, www.tsht.de, Holm Tiffe,
Goethestrasse 15, 09569 Oederan, USt-Id: DE253710583
info(a)tsht.de Tel +49 37292 709778 Mobil: 0172 8790 741
Recently I got a nice and complete PDP-8/s from the US. The power supply
uses a ferroresonant transformer which in addition to the standard primary
and secondary windings has a separate 2.3H winding connected in series to a
2uF 660VAC capacitor forming a resonant "tank" circuit. The transformer's
secondary side and the resonant circuit are operated in saturation. There
is a magnetic shunt to prevent the primary side going into saturation as
well. It accepts a wide input voltage range, but is very sensitive to the
input frequency of 60Hz. This is quite a nice if not elegant design for the
period in question, but maybe not the most efficient.
As I live in Australia I get 240VAC and 50Hz as opposed to the US 115VAC
and 60Hz.
I can easily convert our 240VAC to 115VAC with a step-down transformer, but
cannot easily supply 115VAC at 60Hz. So I was considering using a step-down
transformer to get the 115VAC, but modify the resonant "tank circuit" for
50Hz.
Unfortunately there is some magic I don't understand. The resonant
frequency of a LC circuit with L=2.3H and C=2uF is about 75Hz not the
expected 60Hz.
Otherwise I could just solve the standard LC resonant circuit formula for C
and plug in 50Hz and 2.3H to get the required C.
Obviously ferroresonant transformers are more complex than this former
software engineer can grasp. Could any experienced EE with relevant
transformer knowledge please chime in and help me understand how to
redimension the tank circuit to use 50Hz instead of the original 60Hz input.
Obviously I could replace the entire power supply with two modern switch
mode supplies to create the two rails, but it would be really nice to keep
the original supply and just reversibly adapt it for 50Hz.
Thanks and best regards
Tom
So, I may just be spoiled from using RSX11M-PLUS and now expect too much
from the RSX11M OS. But it seems to me the CLS command would be a
nice-to-have, but I am not able to find anything about it. So did that not
exist for RSX11M? How does one clear the screen in that environment?
-Peter
https://www.raspberrypi.com/products/rp2350/
From postings, I know that folks use the RP2350 for interfacing; the trade press has been shipping news of RP's rev A4 datasheet in volume.
The datasheet should tell all. However, the 5V tollerance of the "IO" pins is significant for its simplification of TTL interfacing; the maximum supply and output voltage remains 3v3. See section 14.8.2 (p 1335) et seq - NB the FT indication.
Martin
I tried to contact rsts.org using their web site form, but it threw a
server error when I tried.
I have two pieces of info for them, if they hang out here:
1) The files at
http://www.rsts.org/autoindex.php?dir=distros/RSTS_tapes/V_10.0/ and
http://www.rsts.org/autoindex.php?dir=distros/RSTS_tapes/V_10.1/
cannot be downloaded: access Forbidden error.
2) I have a product code for the RSTS 10.0 distribution tape (they say
"Unknown DEC Product Code" on the index page.)
The code on the actual tape is BB-P016P-BC RSTS/E V10.0 INSTALL 16MT9
(Unfortunately, my tape has not yet responded to my attempts to read it
- I think the signal that ought to tell the drive it is 1600 BPI PE
isn't being recognized by my HP SCSI tape drive - it thinks the tape is
800BPI, but it works OK with other 1600BPI tapes.)
JRJ
