On 6/23/2026 9:33 AM, Paul Koning via cctalk wrote:
It doesn't really matter. The question was asked
(which is appreciated) and Rich gave his answer. I see no reason to ask him to defend how
he chooses to dispose of his property.
I would also object. If my input is to be used to feed some corporations
AI for profit operation I would likely leave the list.
bill
paul
On Jun 22, 2026, at 10:58 PM, Jim Davis via
cctalk <cctalk(a)classiccmp.org> wrote:
What? Are you chicken McFly? AI is useful as a gopher and another set
of not to be trusted eyes.
On Mon, Jun 22, 2026 at 7:10 PM Rich Alderson via cctalk
<cctalk(a)classiccmp.org> wrote:
>
> Tom Gardner via cctalk <cctalk(a)classiccmp.org> writes:
>
>> This conversation has been fascinating - I'm tempted to collect all of
>> the emails on this topic and run them thru an AI for a summary -
>> anyone object or have a better idea?
>
> Yeah. I object. Don't do that.
>
> --
> Rich Alderson cc(a)alderson.users.panix.com
> Audendum est, et veritas investiganda; quam etiamsi non assequamur,
> omnino tamen proprius, quam nunc sumus, ad eam perveniemus.
> --Galen