Hi all, I wonder if anybody has one with the terminators installed that
can read off the p/n for these SIPs
The manual says they are 8-pin 7 resistor 220/330 ones, but that is not
possible! To put 7 resistor pairs to 220 and 330 you need a 9-pin,
unless you have one resistor SIP for 220 and another for 330!? But there
are 2 so that leaves an odd number! The sockets are 9-pin.? I have yet
to find any 9-pin ones on digikey
cheers,
Nigel
--
Nigel Johnson, MSc., MIEEE, MCSE VE3ID/G4AJQ/VA3MCU
Amateur Radio, the origin of the open-source concept!
Skype: TILBURY2591 nw.johnson at ieee.org
On 2/10/21 1:00 PM, John Many Jars<john at yoyodyne-propulsion.net> wrote:
> So, I have an Apple ][+. It is missing an IC at location a3 on the
> motherboard.
>
> I don't know why. it used to work... I think my mind is going. I have no
> memory or removing it. Anyway, I need another one. The board is marked
> 74166.
>
> Can I put any shift register IC with a similar part no, like this one:
>
> 74166PC | FAIRCHILD | IC DIP-16 Shift Register (icompplus.com)
> <https://www.icompplus.com/en/integrated-circuits/24400/74166PC>
>
> in there, or ?
>
> Thanks,
>
> mark aka john
I have a mobo that has that very part (Fairchild 74166PC), so it's a
good bet it'll work.
- David
Working on fixing a pair of TK70's here to speed up my backups. The TK50
is fine on a TQK70 controller (it streams perfectly) but I am coming
close to filling a tape.
I've managed to assemble a working TK70 out of two unhappy ones, but to
fix the other I need to replace the eject button switch. The
plastic/rubber on it has turned to the usual goo.
Does anyone know the part number for that switch? Taller than a usual
SMD button switch, so a stock one won't work. I could take it apart but
that would be a kludge.
Thanks!
I was just poking around the computerhistory.org website, searching for Knuth stuff.
The second or third hit when I search for "Knuth" is this one: https://computerhistory.org/blog/the-apl-programming-language-source-code/ . It's not just about APL, it actually has a downloadable copy of the source code. And it points to an executable version, apparently a packaged up Hercules running that code.
Nice. I'll have to give it a try.
paul
I suspect the answer to question #1 is no, but thought I would ask.
1) Anyone happen to have a known working Digitalker 54104 IC they are
looking to trade for some cash that does not involve me selling an arm
or a leg :-)?
2) Barring that, anyone have a known working Digitalker-based unit that
might be able to pop in a suspected non working Digitalker IC and test?
I have a Jameco (yep, the parts firm) manufactured Digitalker unit here
called the JE-520 that is my original unit.? It suffered some ROM bit
rot long ago and was not working, but I acquired the ROMs a while back
to repair the unit.
Now, though, as I pull it out for another project, it seems to be
misbehaving.? It's like "address bit 1" on the input commands is acting
up.? For instance, word 48 is "zero", and 49 is "one", but zero will be
followed by "three" and then "zero" and then "three" as one sends values
48,49,50,51 to the unit.? I'm working to confirm the bit 1 on the cable
to the PC is not bad, but initial efforts point to it being the IC.
Jim
--
Jim Brain
brain at jbrain.comwww.jbrain.com
> From: Fritz Mueller
> In at least one case of attempting to recover a pac
BTW, your neat hack to do that only works on the RK11-C, and not the RK11-D:
the latter doesn't implement 'Read/Write-All'.
Noel
> the Unix V6 RK pack formatter ... sets _both_ 'Format' and
> 'Read/Write-All
Oooops; my bad; I mis-read the register description. It's setting 'Inhibit Bus
Address Increment' and 'Format', not 'Format' and 'Read/Write-All'. So ignore my
speculation about 'Read/Write-All' not getting the sector header word from memory.
My bad!
Noel
> Fron: Jon Elson
> The write all function is likely how you format a blank pack.
No, 'Format' is a separate bit in the CSR from 'Read/Write-All', and they do
different things.
The RK11 always re-writes the header word of each sector when it writes a
sector in normal operation; when 'Format' is set on a Write operation, it
merely supresses the 'read header word and check/compare' function (which
normally precedes any disk operation, to make sure the head's at the right
place). Format/Write then goes ahead and writes the header word of the sector,
just as in normal operation. (It is possible to set 'Format' on a Read
operation; that just reads in the sector header words into memory.)
Although in theory one could use 'Read/Write-All/Write' to format packs,
the Unix V6 RK pack formatter:
https://minnie.tuhs.org/cgi-bin/utree.pl?file=V6/usr/source/mdec/rkf.s
sets _both_ 'Format' and 'Read/Write-All', and _doesn't_ set up the sector
header words in the memory buffer, arguing that even with 'Read/Write-All' on,
the hardware is still generating the sector header word contents. (I'm too
lazy to check the RK11-C and RK11-D engineering drawings to confirm that.)
Noel
If you search ebay for "DEC RK11-C Disk Controller", you'll find a listing
of a backplane of flipchip cards, but it's not like any RK11-C I have ever
seen. Am I right, this is a mis-labeled auction?
Bill
> From: Ethan Dicks
> I do have a replica KM-11 set that I need to construct.
You'll need the RK11-C overlays (shown on pg 6-2 of the RK11-c Manual). (My set
of overlays from Guy with his KM11 replica included them; thanks Guy :-).
> From: Fritz Mueller
> The cables are actually in the correct slots -- they connect A30 and
> B30 to the pass-through connectors to support plugging in a pair of
> KM11s from the outside of the rack for debug.
Ah. The Double-Buffered RK11-C doesn't have those; the slots used (looks like
C08 and D08) are used for logic.
Noel